MATThe Graphical Method
Corner-Point Method — Maximisation
A maximisation Linear Programming Problem (LPP) asks for the largest value of a linear objective function over a feasible region carved out by linear constraints. The corner-point method exploits the key theorem that the optimum of a linear function over a convex feasible region occurs at a corner point (vertex), so you only need to evaluate at finitely many corners.
ISC examines this through manufacturing-profit word problems where you must formulate, graph, find corners, and pick the maximum.
Standard maximisation LPP
is the objective (profit), are per-unit profits, and are the non-negative decision variables.
Corner-point evaluation
Evaluate at every vertex of the feasible region; the largest value is the maximum.
Intersection of two boundary lines
Solve simultaneously to locate the corner where two binding constraint lines meet.
Unbounded-region test (for max)
If the open half-plane (with at the best corner) shares points with an unbounded feasible region, has no maximum.
- Step 1: define decision variables clearly; Step 2: write the objective ; Step 3: translate each resource limit into a inequality; Step 4: add .
- Draw each line by its intercepts, then shade the side satisfying the inequality (test the origin when the line does not pass through it).
- The feasible region for a typical maximisation problem (all constraints with ) is a bounded convex polygon.
- List every corner point exactly: include the origin and axis-intercepts as well as line intersections, where these are feasible.
- By the Corner Point Theorem the maximum over a bounded region is always attained at a corner; tabulate at each corner and select the largest.
- If two corners give the same maximum , every point on the joining edge is optimal, so there are infinitely many optimal solutions.
- Production quantities are usually required to be non-negative; state the optimal and the maximum profit explicitly with units (Rs).
- Shading the wrong side of a constraint line, which produces an incorrect feasible region and wrong corners.
- Forgetting to test or include all corner points (especially axis intercepts and the origin), so the true maximum is missed.
- For an unbounded region, assuming a maximum exists without applying the open half-plane check.
- Reading off the graph approximately instead of solving the two boundary lines simultaneously for exact corner coordinates.
- Applicationmanufacturing-profit formulation and solutionA company manufactures two types of toys, and . Each toy of type requires minutes on machine and minute on machine , while each toy of type requires minute on machine and minutes on machine . Machine is available for at most minutes and machine for at most minutes. If the profit is on each toy and on each toy (in Rs), formulate the LPP and find the number of toys of each type that should be produced to maximise the profit.
- Diagram / graphfeasible region by intercepts and origin testSolve the following LPP graphically: Maximise subject to , , . Draw the feasible region, mark its corner points, and hence find the maximum value of .
- Numericalcorner points from simultaneous boundary linesThe feasible region of an LPP is bounded by the lines and together with the coordinate axes. Find the coordinates of all the corner points of this region.
- Numericalcorner point theorem; tabulate and select maximumThe corner points of a feasible region are , , and . For the objective function , evaluate at each corner point and hence determine the point at which is maximum and the maximum value of .
- Give reasonsinfinitely many optimal solutions along an edgeFor a maximisation LPP the objective function attains the value at the two corner points and of a bounded feasible region. State, with reasons, how many optimal solutions the problem has and describe the set of all such solutions.
- Multiple choicecorner point theoremThe maximum value of subject to the constraints , , , occurs at the corner point: (a) (b) (c) (d) .
Written for Sublevo. Question text quoted anywhere in these notes is the Council’s and carries its year and paper; the board’s own diagrams are not reproduced.