CHEInner Transition Elements
Lanthanoid Contraction
Lanthanoid contraction is the steady decrease in atomic and ionic size from to as the subshell fills. It explains the close similarity of and congeners and the gradation in properties down the series.
Filling of the 4f subshell across the series
the electrons shield the nucleus poorly, so on outer shells rises from to .
- Definition: the regular, small decrease in atomic and ionic radii across the lanthanoids from to .
- Cause: poor, imperfect shielding by electrons, so as nuclear charge increases the effective nuclear charge felt by outer electrons rises steadily and pulls the shells inward.
- Consequence: second () and third () transition series congeners have almost equal radii — and (also , ) are nearly identical in size and so very similar chemically and hard to separate.
- Consequence: basicity of decreases from to , because the shrinking holds more tightly (rising charge/size ratio increases covalent character).
- Consequence: the lanthanoids are so alike in size that they occur together and are difficult to separate by ordinary methods (ion-exchange or solvent extraction is needed).
- Lanthanoids vs actinoids: actinoids show a wider range of oxidation states and are all radioactive, whereas lanthanoids are mostly and only promethium is radioactive.
- The total contraction is small (about Å overall) but cumulative — the subshell is buried deep inside, so each successive step shrinks the radius only slightly.
- Because orbitals lie deep inside, the lanthanoids show very similar chemistry (almost all ), and their compounds differ only gradually in size-dependent properties.
- The contraction is the reason the third transition series elements (, , , etc.) are much denser than the second series, even though they are one period lower.
- A similar but smaller effect, the actinoid contraction, occurs across the series for the same shielding reason.
- Attributing the contraction to or electrons; it is the poor shielding by the inner electrons that causes it.
- Saying basicity of increases across the series; it decreases from to as the ion shrinks.
- Claiming is much larger than because it is a period below; the lanthanoid contraction makes their radii nearly equal.
- Confusing lanthanoid contraction (size decrease across the series) with the general atomic-radius trend across a -block period.
- Stating all lanthanoids are radioactive; only promethium () is, whereas all actinoids are radioactive.
- Give reasonscause: poor shielding by electronsAccount for the steady decrease in atomic and ionic radii of the lanthanoids from to .
- Give reasonsconsequence: nearly equal radii of and congenersGive reasons: and have almost identical atomic radii and are very difficult to separate.
- Define / statedefinition and causeWhat is meant by lanthanoid contraction? Name the subshell whose imperfect shielding is responsible for it.
- Give reasonsconsequence: basicity of decreasesAccount for the fact that the basic strength of the hydroxides decreases from to across the series.
- Distinguishlanthanoids vs actinoidsGive two points of difference between the lanthanoids and the actinoids with reference to their oxidation states and radioactivity.
- Assertion–Reasonconsequence: density of third transition seriesAssertion: The third transition series elements such as and are much denser than their second-series congeners. Reason: Lanthanoid contraction keeps their atomic radii nearly equal while atomic mass increases. State whether both are correct and whether the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.
Written for Sublevo. Question text quoted anywhere in these notes is the Council’s and carries its year and paper; the board’s own diagrams are not reproduced.